Jerome wrote his three-book commentary on Galatians in 386, within months of settling in Bethlehem after his expulsion from Rome. It belongs to a burst of work on the Pauline letters—Philemon, Galatians, Ephesians, Titus—produced for Paula and her daughter Eustochium, the Roman women who had followed him east and whose requests for exposition he answers in the prefaces. He is candid about his dependence: he tells his readers he has consulted the five books Origen devoted to this epistle, along with Didymus, Apollinaris of Laodicea, Eusebius of Emesa, and Theodore of Heraclea, and he complains that years of Hebrew study have left his Latin rough. The result is the earliest surviving Latin commentary on Galatians to work systematically through the Greek exegetical tradition, and much of what Origen said about the letter survives only here.
The method is a running exposition, lemma by lemma, in which Jerome frequently sets several readings side by side rather than forcing a single one. His governing concern is Paul's argument that the Law has been superseded, and he is at pains to defend that claim against both Marcion, who had used Galatians to cut Paul loose from the Old Testament, and the pagan critic Porphyry, who had seized on the quarrel at Antioch to mock the apostles as men at odds with one another. It is in answering Porphyry that Jerome makes his most consequential move. Following Origen, he reads Paul's rebuke of Peter in Galatians 2 as a staged performance: Peter withdrew from Gentile tables for the sake of Jewish believers, Paul objected for the sake of Gentile believers, and the two acted out a disagreement they did not actually hold so that the lesson about the Law's end would land. The reading preserves apostolic concord at the cost of apostolic candor, and Jerome knows it, which is why he argues it at length. Elsewhere the commentary shows the philologist at work—notes on textual variants, on Hebrew idiom behind Paul's citations, and on the Galatians themselves, whom Jerome, having visited Ancyra, says spoke a tongue close to that of the Treveri in Gaul.
The commentary's afterlife was shaped by Augustine, who read the Antioch passage and objected in a series of letters that if the apostles could lie for a good end, no text of Scripture could be trusted. Jerome defended himself, and the exchange became the classic patristic argument over whether Scripture may contain any falsehood at all. The dispute gave Jerome's commentary a prominence beyond its exegetical merits, and it remains the natural place to watch a fourth-century Latin reader absorbing Greek theology, Hebrew learning, and anti-pagan apologetic at once.
Who should read this: those studying the history of Pauline interpretation, the reception of Origen in the West, or the Jerome–Augustine correspondence on scriptural truthfulness. It is not a devotional reading of Galatians and will frustrate anyone seeking a single, settled interpretation of each verse; readers wanting Jerome at his most pastoral should turn to the letters instead.
Commentary on Galatians
by Jerome
For For students of Paul's reception: three books on Galatians drawing on Origen's lost commentary, the source of Jerome's quarrel with Augustine over Peter's 'pretence' at Antioch; Latin only.
Jerome wrote his three-book commentary on Galatians in 386, within months of settling in Bethlehem after his expulsion from Rome. It belongs to a burst of work on the Pauline letters—Philemon, Galatians, Ephesians, Titus—produced for Paula and her daughter Eustochium, the Roman women who had followed him east and whose requests for exposition he answers in the prefaces. He is candid about his dependence: he tells his readers he has consulted the five books Origen devoted to this epistle, along with Didymus, Apollinaris of Laodicea, Eusebius of Emesa, and Theodore of Heraclea, and he complains that years of Hebrew study have left his Latin rough. The result is the earliest surviving Latin commentary on Galatians to work systematically through the Greek exegetical tradition, and much of what Origen said about the letter survives only here.
The method is a running exposition, lemma by lemma, in which Jerome frequently sets several readings side by side rather than forcing a single one. His governing concern is Paul's argument that the Law has been superseded, and he is at pains to defend that claim against both Marcion, who had used Galatians to cut Paul loose from the Old Testament, and the pagan critic Porphyry, who had seized on the quarrel at Antioch to mock the apostles as men at odds with one another. It is in answering Porphyry that Jerome makes his most consequential move. Following Origen, he reads Paul's rebuke of Peter in Galatians 2 as a staged performance: Peter withdrew from Gentile tables for the sake of Jewish believers, Paul objected for the sake of Gentile believers, and the two acted out a disagreement they did not actually hold so that the lesson about the Law's end would land. The reading preserves apostolic concord at the cost of apostolic candor, and Jerome knows it, which is why he argues it at length. Elsewhere the commentary shows the philologist at work—notes on textual variants, on Hebrew idiom behind Paul's citations, and on the Galatians themselves, whom Jerome, having visited Ancyra, says spoke a tongue close to that of the Treveri in Gaul.
The commentary's afterlife was shaped by Augustine, who read the Antioch passage and objected in a series of letters that if the apostles could lie for a good end, no text of Scripture could be trusted. Jerome defended himself, and the exchange became the classic patristic argument over whether Scripture may contain any falsehood at all. The dispute gave Jerome's commentary a prominence beyond its exegetical merits, and it remains the natural place to watch a fourth-century Latin reader absorbing Greek theology, Hebrew learning, and anti-pagan apologetic at once.
Who should read this: those studying the history of Pauline interpretation, the reception of Origen in the West, or the Jerome–Augustine correspondence on scriptural truthfulness. It is not a devotional reading of Galatians and will frustrate anyone seeking a single, settled interpretation of each verse; readers wanting Jerome at his most pastoral should turn to the letters instead.
Editions
External off-site sources
Free downloads